User talk:DimiTalen

Message from the Mäöreser Ambassador
Dear King Dimitri I of Lovia,

I have sent this message to you because Mäöres is in need of your help. An earthquake has struck our country in March and we are now rebuilding the affected towns. We would like to replace the destroyed coal plant with a power station which generates cleaner energy. We are wondering whether Lovia could help us by giving us the knowledge and tools which are necessary for constructing such a power station.

The Mäöreser Ambassador 13:15, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Clean as in... nuclear? I can't remember signing the non-proliferation treaty so no problem there. If you want something official you'd have to ask Congress though. 13:18, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * We would gladly help you. I would however like to just point out we signed a bill into law that states that we do not produce, import or export non-sustainable energy (including nuclear energy). I'm sure we won't be exporting that energy, but helping you build a nuclear power station is a bit hypocrite... Nevertheless, we're willing to help, I guess. What are your exact plans? 07:15, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I didn't really mean nuclear power station, 'cause we already have one :P I actually meant "climate neutral" energy. The university of Mäöres will take a look at tidal and wave power stations, but they probably won't generate enough energy, so we'll also need solar and wind power. For those we need your help.
 * My exact plans can be found here. At the moment we have one destroyed coal plant, one functioning coal plant, one nuclear plant, one biomassacentrale (or something like that, Ben's idea :P) and one wave power station. I'll close the nuclear plant and demolish the destroyed coal plant. In order to compensate that we'll have to build two wave power stations, three tidal power stations, one wind park at sea and one solar station for which we need to create new land (not polder, but "ophogen" :P). Giving people solar panels can't be done cause we quite don't have any money :( --O u WTBsjrief-mich 08:19, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * While giving nuclear power is out of order, the Japanese would like to find some type of agreement with Lovia on sending aid to Maoreser, while we are indeed in hard times with money, Cleaner energy is always a great investment to the world.
 * [[Image:800px-Flag of Japan.svg.png|25px|border]] Ambassador Tadashi Yamaguchi 21:52, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Jazz We Can
Ever fancied Jazz, i think i might like to organize a Jazzy festival in Lovia, you know i'm starting to like the non-rhythmics (as i like to call jazz). I don't know if you want to help or have some ideas, i'm waiting for your advice and answer. Jon Johnson 07:45, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I want to start a band!! Any ideas for a name? 07:48, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe wait dimi's answer here, then you can release the first plate at the festival Jon Johnson 07:49, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeay! If you need a sponsor Flérisonne would be glad to support the artistic community.  07:51, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Pabst is waiting too :p Jon Johnson 07:56, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sjonnieboy, that's a magnificent idea! Flérisonne and Pabst seem like two great sponsors. What about this: I'll start up a little project tonight, you guys do the sponsoring and look for some bands, and within a week we have a great festival! 14:43, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Gorgeous, i'll need some feedback because i don't really know that much, i'm a starter. My noblest friend need to borrow me his cd's still, but i guess it'll work out just fine. Jon Johnson 15:19, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sure that guy will bestow his jazz collection upon you as soon as possible. Just give me some time, and I'll start up the festival project. What about Portland as its first location? 18:01, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * That would be great man! You have the inland beach at your disposal Jon Johnson 20:05, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I always liked Jazz and classical music but since there are no big names now-a-days it's hard for people to like it. A festival at the beach with music count me in! Marcus Villanova WLP [[Image:Flag of Lovia Small.png|border|20px]] 20:16, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

yeeeeeehah, we have our first visitor! Jon Johnson 20:19, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Count me in just as well! -- 13:44, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Libertan cool jazz
Interested in having the New Old Philosopher's Trio playing at Jazz Portland? ((and I also need your help for just a sec at Wikistad, I'd like you to rename to Philosophers_Trio.jpg, please (now it still has its original name from Wikimedia Commons, silly me :p)  Echo cho 08:45, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Our first international name on the poster. Which reminds me, we need an impeccable design! 13:14, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm on it. They sure are welcome at the festival! I'll give them a place somewhere! 17:14, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Great, I'm proud of them, hoorah for Libertas! :p K_gitaar.png Echo cho 17:36, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Wikistad Books!
On my sand pit (User:Crystalbeastdeck09/Sandpit) I translated the story about the inuit family, but is sorta chopy. We need to save Libertas lit! Thanks! Marcus Villanova WLP 20:59, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Great man! Okay to publish it September 1st? I'll design an English version cover. 07:07, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nah all good media comes out on a tuesday and it's still in editing, so September 7th is better! Marcus Villanova WLP [[Image:Flag of Lovia Small.png|border|20px]] 13:53, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * All good media comes out on a Tuesday, why's that? I never liked Tuesdays, they are so 'Wednesday is over and the weekend is still so far away'. 15:05, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yuri: I suppose you mean Thursday? 15:46, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think tuesday became a custom bacuse Billboard realeases there chart on Monday and everything then catched on and followed! Marcus Villanova WLP [[Image:Flag of Lovia Small.png|border|20px]] 17:32, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sounds credible :) 18:02, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * @Dimi: there are but three days in a week... 07:09, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

HRH's mysterious ways
How very polite of you to delete images without notifying the uploader when you know he's online. 09:18, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * It was marked "delete", and not used anywhere. If you want it back, because it's useful or valuable, then just place it back, yeah. 09:20, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * I used them on the page of Kings. Not valuable? They tied the page together!!  09:22, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * shut up king, you have no point of reference here :p JON   THE DUDE   JOHNSON  10:47, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * I put the map back. I don't know how it ever got marked for deletion but that was clearly a mistake. Thanks for the support Dude. 11:43, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

State Council
Okay so I relize that It's fine to make State Politics into Local Politics but in which case we then still need a political system within it. On my Sidepage User:Crystalbeastdeck09/Politics I do a simulation of the event. There is enough people if people are in Two councils with half of them only in one. The only prob in Oceana The state only has two active members which puts it out there that state elections might not go as well in that state. Just saying from Marcus Villanova WLP 17:31, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Hooray!
Woo, 50 points. :D -Perryz101 20:36, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * You should always keep doing edits tho. I guess he'll make you a citizen tomorrow. I know he'll ask you this anyway so to speed things up he'll want to know your Residence, Gender, and Chartecter Name.! Marcus Villanova Walden [[Image:Flag of Lovia Small.png|border|20px]] 20:44, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Zackary Daniel Bennett
 * Male
 * Bennett Family Estate, Pineview Court.

Hunk
Where is the 'volglijst'? JON  THE DUDE   JOHNSON  12:29, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you use the "new" skin, like I do, it's under "My Home". But I suppose you're still using the old Wikipedia skin? Martha Van Ghent 16:27, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes I do, and he's gone over there, which is quite annoying JON   THE DUDE   JOHNSON  18:12, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have the same problem. Solution: type 'volglijst' (or 'watchlist') in the url-bar and press enter. It's crappy but it works. 05:57, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I just consult the recent changes list now. Bold typeface then means that something's on your watchlist. 07:30, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's okay, he's back somehow JON   THE DUDE   JOHNSON  08:00, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes indeed, here too  08:04, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Statistics
Hey Dimi, I need some data. I know you quite well so all I need for now is your political stance - the real life one. Just try to find one word that describes it as best as possible. Thanks. 11:38, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * In real life? Tough... My FB says "tending towards modern social democracy". Probably I am most near to social liberalism / progressivism.
 * Don't forget to mention I'm an atheist. (Just joking: you knew that already of course) 20:22, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wa :P --O u WTBsjrief-mich 05:45, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why wa?  06:00, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * @Dimi: I did indeed. 07:02, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wa because of «Don't forget to mention I'm an atheist.». --O u WTBsjrief-mich 12:44, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hehe. 08:06, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

English Grammar
Can you help me out with the TO/TOO distinction? JON  THE DUDE   JOHNSON  10:26, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright. It's really simple, actually.
 * When you intend to say or write a word that corresponds with the sounds /too/ (in Dutch: toe), there are three options: , and.
 * Always use , except in these cases:
 * is the number. Simple.
 * means "also" (Dutch: ook) or "to an excessive degree; over; more than enough" (Dutch: te). You may use it in these cases:
 * (1) "I went to Jazz Middelheim. - Yeah, me too!"
 * (1) "The oil business, too, is having a tough time lately." (implying: like another business I mentioned earlier)
 * (2) "He's too old/fat/annoying/radical..." (meaning: more than would be good)
 * To conclude, here's two final notes I wanted to give you, and all of the others too:
 * Pay attention to the use of to/two/too in your daily writing, and you'll get more and more proficient in it.
 * Translate to Dutch or your mother language if it's not English, and you'll soon find out what meaning you're trying to express.
 * 11:07, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks mate: Me too will do my best to make no mistakes JON   THE DUDE   JOHNSON  13:23, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, y'a welcome. 07:23, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Legal mess
First of all I want you to know I'm finally working out some social legislation on my Sandpit. Second, our legal system is kind of a mess. We have a Constitution of which the content is not clearly lined out and all the other bills are just tossed on a giant heap called 'Federal Law'. Without changing the content of any legal document I would like to do the following: I'm not sure where I need what permissions for exactly, maybe you can help me out on this one? 13:41, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Defining our Constitution as 'basic principles of the Lovian state' (like the kingdom, division in states, liberal freedoms, etc.) + 'organizational matters involving users' (like elections, lawsuits, etc.)
 * Reorganizing the Federal Law into several Law Books like Criminal Law, Social Legislation and Environmental Legislation.
 * You would need a normal Congressial majority to reform FedLaw and two thirds to do something about the Constitution. My personal opinion: this "mess" thing doesn't really matter. It's messy in one way (the heap), but it's tidy in another (no difficulties deciding what belongs where). 07:22, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * True, but just scroll down the list of fedlaw articles, it's so trivial, Yuri has a point i guess JON   THE DUDE   JOHNSON  07:24, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure he has. But it doesn't really matter, does it? Anyone can find any article of the law without problems. They have relevant names, they're all group on one page and they're sorted by date of approval - which might be handy too. 07:27, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know, it's easy now, but i think if it can be structured (and if yuri does it, it'll be good), why wouldn't we try, maybe it still can be grouped on one page, but with subtitles or something <font color=Navy>JON   THE DUDE   <font color=Navy>JOHNSON  07:30, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fine, why not. But it better be good. And tell Medvedev that he may update the hundreds of pages that use article numbers as a legal reference ;). (I'm not kidding) 07:33, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I think we can at least try to organize a bit, we are professionals (couldn't stand it :D) <font color=Navy>JON   THE DUDE   <font color=Navy>JOHNSON  07:36, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. 07:37, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think we need to change much. I will simply subdivide the Federal Law for starters. Think about it as a closet (Federal law) in which we will create drawers (social law, etc.) 08:27, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Question: could you take a look on this page? Is voting actually required for a reorganization? Again: no content of the law is altered. 09:07, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's the way i would do it also, i think voting isn't needed here <font color=Navy>JON   THE DUDE   <font color=Navy>JOHNSON  09:23, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course voting is required. We amend the law, don't we? Just put it to a vote in Congress - I'm sure it'll pass without fault. 09:26, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm just relocating some place bills and adding some titles. This has nothing to do with making policy or anything. Just doing it wouldn't violate any law, would it? 09:28, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * It would violate the Constitution: "a proposal to amend a section of the Federal Law" requires "a normal majority" to pass (Article 6 of the Constitution). If only for changing the numbers of the bills. Just do it, there's no reason to be afraid of a vote. If I allow you to do this, we ought to allow every MOTC to change the order. Talking of a mess. 09:33, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * I wasn't asking you to give me permission, because you can't. I was just discussing how we are ought to interpret the Law. According to me it would be sufficient if I officially file for permission with the Secretary of Justice. This issue is more of an executive power thing than a legislative one. 09:38, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * And I disagree. I'll give you a ridiculous example to prove that nobody has the right to re-arrange law without a vote: most bills that were voted in Congress included an article number. In most cases, the article headings were part of the bill that was passed by Congress, thus. Changing them would be a legal amendment. So, voting is required. Stupid example, but it does the trick. 12:50, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good thing you can't be judge because you view the law is too much as a set of static rules of defined cases, Dimi. The law is just a bunch of guidelines, templates that can fit multiple cases but are defined in vague and abstract terms. But that doesn't mind since I already put it to a vote. 13:04, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't go staticking on me! I am a "every stay off the law" man, and you should be too. If I've learnt one thing, as a linguist in spe, then it is that structural changes always imply content changes. Content changes require Congressial majority. 13:11, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Structural changes always imply content changes? That seems a huge overstatement. I didn't meant to upset you, Dimi. It is just that in general our law system sucks. Structural changes could give us some more insight. 13:17, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Not at all an overstatement. By re-structuring a text, for example, you imply hierarchy, order, likeness in content, etc. I agree that it is useful to do so in Lovian law, and therefore I support your bill. But it is a change of content, or at least, it could be, if it leads to different interpretations, which it will. 13:21, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * You can change the context of a law, but not giving contest would be a sin. There is no change to the content of the bill, nor will its effect alter. The bills can already be interpreted differently. As I see it, Congress isn't allowed to vote on the restructuring since it isn't a motion (defined by Congress as a new law, altering a law or deleting one). However, since Lovia is a democracy and the Congress represents the people our MOTC do have the ultimate right to approve or appeal anything. Now thát is how law interpretation should work.  13:25, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Noble City International Airport
Hi :) As you seem to be the owner of the Noble City International Airport I think I should ask my question to you. I have been planning a small regional airport (meaning landingsbaan en restaurant) near Hurbanova for a long time. A suitable location would be north of Millstreet (which is on the other side of the Hurbanova stream and an area currently rather useless, there already is a tweebaanswegbrug to it).

As I already said, the plan is not too big, just one airport to fly from and to in order to make the town better accessible. Your airport (Noble City International Airport) is probably the best option then, but of course I'm not going to do that without your permission. I honestly also don't know whether a new airport would require congress to vote... --O u WTBsjrief-mich 16:46, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * An airstrip thus? Seems rather fine with me. I don't think a vote is necessary: until now the airports have been operated privately. If you want it to be owned by the state, you could propose that of course   16:59, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok :) I'll soon start working on it. First I have to come up with a name, some nice images, a bull-shit story etc, you know, normal stuff for a page :P I'm not very in a creative atmosphere now :) --O u WTBsjrief-mich 17:02, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha . If I may make a suggestion? Try concrete, glass or metal instead of wood this time ;) 17:04, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * No!!! I was more thinking of a cave or something alike :P --O u WTBsjrief-mich 17:10, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Michal Hrbiť
Could you unprotect it? I was still working on it :) --O u WTBsjrief-mich 12:43, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure :) 11:36, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

2010 Congress
Could you update the composition changes? SjorskingmaWikistad 14:03, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's wait for the elections maybe and then make a full chart :p <font color=Navy>JON   THE DUDE   <font color=Navy>JOHNSON  14:42, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I will make the several missing versions soon, yes. 11:36, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Monarchy
The monarchy has not a place in modern Lovia and its government. It is an antiqued form of government which is undemocratic, unconstitutional and worst of all, is totally in favour of dictatorile power and injustice. Lovia is a progressive nation and has to see that monarchy is a hinder to progress, advancement and prosperity of the nation. Michel-s 19:16, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for your incredibly enlightening advice. 11:36, September 22, 2010 (UTC)