Talk:Kings Public Planning Service

Yuri, I am afraid you're pushing the boundaries of the Constitution. I fear that "running all government owned infrastructure in the state" and "integrating different logistic and economic issues into the state policy" does not fall under these categories:
 * ''The naming, organizing and maintaining of urban parks, public places, streets, markets, roads (with the exclusion of highways), waterways, natural areas and environmentally significant places that are not protected by the federal government, culturally significant monuments that are not protected by the federal government.
 * ''Informing the state population about the various aspects of the state, the federal government and its policies.
 * ''The construction and planning of neighborhoods and hamlets.
 * ''Bringing the people of Lovia and the different levels and branches of government closer to one another.
 * ''Advising the Lovian Congress on issues related to the particular state.
 * ''Advising federal institutions in relation to protected natural regions and culturally significant locations and monuments in the particular state.

States (and their Governors) are not entitled to found and own companies, are not entitled to run railway stations (this task is taken up by the Department of Transportation). As I said, I am afraid the creation and ownership of this company (and the state's shares in the Cooperative Farming I.) are illegitimate. That's because the Constitution is very clear on what states can and cannot do. The things described above can be done, the rest not (I quote: "All competencies not covered by the states inhere to the federal level."). -- 07:29, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * To all others: please do not make this into a discussion of "what states should be able to do". I am just applying the Constitution here. Full, in-depth discussions can take place in the First Chamber. -- 07:29, October 24, 2010 (UTC)