Talk:La Quotidienne

зOriginal name :P --O u WTB 18:16, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * Mersi! "Cotidianul" was misschien toch beter geweest? >:) --Bucurestean 18:26, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * Mersie*. Denk 't :P --O u WTB 18:29, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * Mersië :S --Bucurestean 18:45, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nee, dan is 't mersieë (spreek uit: mársjah zoiets). Dat is de datief van "mersie" (het bedankje). In iets als: "Bie het bedankje viel ik van m'n stoel" -> "Bie g'm mersieë vole 'ch ven miene stole." --O u WTB 18:49, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry, I'll finish the article soon... (my dog guinnea pig ate it) ^^ --Bucurestean 18:48, November 8, 2009 (UTC) LAZY
 * :P --O u WTB 18:49, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

Is 't nu ook al een radiostation? --O u WTB 19:18, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * No, why, because of "stay tuned"? :D --Bucurestean 19:24, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * Ssjjjt :P --O u WTB 19:25, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations
Looks well! Nicely done. I am happy to see our press is thriving once again. 18:17, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * --> he's saying after one article (A) --Bucurestean 19:07, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * It just looks well . 19:09, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

Eigenlijk vind ik wel dat 'ie kinderen moet krijgen om de dynastie voort te zetten è, maar honderden.. --O u WTB 05:01, November 10, 2009 (UTC)


 * What is a Sickpit-phenomenon? Lars Washington 10:11, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Sickpit-phenomenon = "I don't know" --Bucurestean 15:44, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Ik stem enkel op rood, omdat in Montfort 75% van de bevolking rood is :P Ik als halve Etsberger ben bruinharig :P --O u WTB 16:17, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Mwah, 'k heb het niet zo met rooien (A) --Bucurestean 16:18, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Gelukkig ben 'k maar niet rood dan è :P --O u WTB 16:19, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Vraagje, wanneer je mocht kiezen, rood of kaal, wat kies je dan? Ik dacht, beter rode Jan dan blode Jan Lars Washington 16:23, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Rood, kun je nog altijd een kleuringje aan geven è :P --O u WTB 16:24, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Ben wél benieuwd hoe Bucurestean erover denkt. Lars Washington 16:25, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Rood of kaal? Ligt eraan, een afro bijv is altijd vet :P --Bucurestean 16:28, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Wat is een afro? --Lars Washington 16:34, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * http://images.google.nl/images?hl=nl&source=hp&q=afro&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi --Bucurestean 16:36, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * 16:39, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * --Lars Washington 16:41, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * --Bucurestean 16:43, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Lol. 16:52, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * A red afro? Mm.. --O u WTB 16:54, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Een pruik ?!--Lars Washington 16:57, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * :)) --Bucurestean 16:52, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Sven Plemming
Je doet afbreuk aan de geloofwaardigheid van je gazet als ik eerlijk ben. --O u WTB 18:14, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Freedom of publishing :P --Bucurestean 18:18, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Freedom of speech (Geertje doet dat ook è :P) Je gazet is net zo'n damesroddelmagazijn waar niets in staat :P --O u WTB 18:19, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Or you're the only one to not recognise his death? :D --Bucurestean 18:21, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * He can still be active at landj è. --O u WTB 18:21, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * If he has died, I doubt he's still editing on landj :P --Bucurestean 18:22, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * He hasn't died :P It was just a "list". He has now become a "kluizenaar" è, so he can concentrate on his poetry. --O u WTB 18:23, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * So we've found an other buddy? :O --Bucurestean 18:24, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, he shot down his twin brother Mohammed. --O u WTB 18:25, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * O, you mean Mohammed El Poponar (what was you're sockpuppet's name? :P) --Bucurestean 18:27, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. Gustav has just confirmed this ;) --O u WTB 18:28, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Hahahah :D Wat slecht :P --O u WTB 18:41, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * :)) --Bucurestean 18:43, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Tabloid or not, this newspaper is a real pleasure to read :) 18:43, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Hahhaha :P --Bucurestean 18:45, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Because of the language mistakes, right ;) And the article about Anfii* --Bucurestean 18:46, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

I don't give a narnja hahaha :P --Bucurestean 19:00, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * I think it's a bad quote of the week :P Now I'm off -> swimming :'( --O u WTB 19:03, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * :( --Bucurestean 19:05, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't agree. It's quite good :) 19:07, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, otherwise I wouldn't have put it in my newspaper --Bucurestean 19:09, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Polls
I like the polls. Perhaps you could make it this newspaper's "trademark". La Quotidienne, news and polls on a daily basis. 19:15, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Not a bad idea. --Bucurestean 19:19, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Ooops
"Afraid of" toch? --82.171.95.220 20:03, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * We (read: OWTB) should actually publish a gedichtenbundel of Anfii! :D --82.171.95.220 20:05, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * "Afraid of", indeed. And please guys, no more publishing of things by sockpuppets. Don't remind me of these sockpuppets, if you wish to leave that behind and move on as a free man. 20:10, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * (A) "Looks at OWTB, gives him a ;)" --Bucurestean 20:12, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * I actually meant a collection of existing poems written by Anfius... he's dead though, how do you expect him to write another one? --Bucurestean 20:13, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * You know what I mean guys. What already exists on the Plemming gang, exists; but I don't want you to write about new articles about him, or extend it visibly. Right? He shouldn't even be here, so don't exaggerate. 20:15, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * :O Why so suddenly this turning point. Just because I wrote an article in my newspaper? I hated him too, that's why I decided to create his death, like OWTB created his "birth", so we could finally end this Anfial chapter. --Bucurestean 20:19, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't misunderstand me. I'm fine with the article (in fact, I think of it as a good solution), but I hope you understand I don't want more and more on the guy. I kinda hate what happened, because it ruined the wiki for more than a year. I don't care too much if you publish some of "his" poems. Just don't elaborate on it. If we want good articles about sth or sb, let's then write new articles, or articles on decent existing people. Begrijp je? 20:22, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course, no problem. I didn't mean we should end up with even more articles about Plemming. --Bucurestean 20:23, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, then we understand each other. I don't want you to think you can't write newspaper articles on the Plemming dude or on anything else - I'm perfectly alright with the rumors and stories you write here . 20:24, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Is this you meant by "Yes, and get kids too, hundreds of kids like the Arabian sheiks"? 20:29, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * No, 14 is nothing. There was one Arabian sheik which had 14 wives and about 900 kids. A while ago in the news. Let me search... --Bucurestean 20:33, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * I can imagine his |____| having fallen off... 20:35, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * The numbers can't be correct, probably around the 200. But I can't find it :S. Anyway, I've found this. It's not a sheikh though ;) --Bucurestean 20:43, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

The text about King Dimitri is incorrect
It is still missing some elementary questions to which should be given an answer. First of all: what has happened to Sigma, of whom we heard a lot in the past, but now remains very silent... Second: what should be the reason for the king to marry at such a young age and so shortly after he has become familiar with Mary Elisabeth Nelson? I think those questions should be answered and then we would have made a lot progress in our investigation è. --O u WTB 07:54, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Sigma?  Lol. Who or what is Sigma?
 * 2) I didn't announce a marriage!  07:56, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Hold you but not of the dumbs è :P
 * Don't worry, we will help you a bit with the marriage if it will come è :P I am critically taking a look at this text and say that you don't have any reason to marry now. --O u WTB 08:04, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Seems we used the name 'Sigma' quite a lot in Yuri-Dimitri-conversations
 * I'm glad you're being critical :D 08:09, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * :P --O u WTB 08:12, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * OWTB, just compare this newspaper to De Telegraaf and then you'll understand . Even though it's by far the biggest newspaper of Holland, they put things like "Camel fucks owner" on the frontpage. --Bucurestean 08:40, November 21, 2009 (UTC)

Komt er nog een artikel ove rmij? McCrooke 15:02, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope, but you have your own newspaper to write in. --Bucurestean 15:03, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * But this is a tabloid! McCrooke 15:06, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * You are a tabloid... --Bucurestean 15:08, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Hahahahahahahaha. Nice one! 15:14, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Is this a complot against me? McCrooke 15:16, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Just two people feeling the same about you, I suppose... 15:18, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * IILl write a article on it at TN McCrooke 15:18, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Great. --Bucurestean 15:20, November 21, 2009 (UTC)

Stoop the the nati-me sentiment
Please stop the anti-me sentiment otherwise i have to start trial against this becuase of Libel Pierlot McCrooke 09:50, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, Mr. McCrooke, don't make a big fuss of it . They only say your are "controversial" and that you have been in prison once or twice. But they also say good things! You are an "international personality"! -- 09:52, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * --Bucurestean 13:47, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

LOWIA wont make a chance Pierlot McCrooke 14:54, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

This is really getting very professional here. I like it very much. --Lars Washington 14:58, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Merci --Bucurestean 14:58, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * I absolutely agree with Lars!     15:11, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * That's because of LOWIA of course --O u WTB 15:26, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

Why does everyone have one vote (prime-minister thing)? --O u WTB 08:22, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * No clue. I am getting tired of these stupid polls. Why don't we just wait until January 1? 08:23, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm waiting since December 31, 2008. --O u WTB 08:26, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Because it takes so long. And then we have to wait another month... --Bucurestean 10:14, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * :'( --O u WTB 10:18, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

We should start a trial against Pierius Pierlot McCrooke 16:27, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Abou the newest article
I already warned for that admin situation earlier in this month.Pierlot McCrooke 12:55, December 23, 2009 (UTC)


 * You are going to loss this trial, Pierlot. The "red baron" will win. Because it is a nonsense-trial, a "heksenjacht", a personal vendetta of you, mr. McCrooke. Mark my words. Dr. Magnus 13:15, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

There seems to be something wrong with the heading. 08:09, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

Make the news
What should I know to make news, for my charachters William Johnson or Amy Johnson? I have made Amy a blog, but still haven't made the news yet. All I read about is the Baron and the dirty stinking communists, nothing about LOWIA... :) William Johnson 12:29, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * You may write anything about LOWIA in my newspaper, if it's relevant enough it may stay. ;) You are always allowed to write in La Quotidienne. --Bucurestean 12:36, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Bucu, Could you write a 'vervolgartikel' of the king article of yesterday? Pierlot McCrooke 12:37, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Why? When I wrote that article I was pretty pissed off, now I'm not so I don't have any inspiration, nor any hunger to write something at the moment ;) --Bucurestean 12:39, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * I think the King issue needs more investigation. Ill support the article Pierlot McCrooke

Thanks. I'll try to. If I make some mistakes, then please go over the article to get them out! :) William Johnson 12:38, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course, no problem at all. Thank you for participating :) --Bucurestean 12:39, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

Done. I hope you like it! William Johnson 12:44, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * It's good ;) --Bucurestean 12:52, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

Wait, I added some more. Now I'm done! :) William Johnson 12:55, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

I hope something news pops up. I am very interested in a Opinon article Pierlot McCrooke 12:11, December 25, 2009 (UTC)

you have to change the newest article Pierlot McCrooke 08:03, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why didn't you stay alive in the first place? this is kind of a New Testament-like thing! 08:33, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nothing wrong with the bible è. --O u WTB 08:34, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * My death was only rumors Pierlot McCrooke 08:35, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I haven't read the Bible yet, so i couldn't say  08:43, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ouch èch è :P Sjaam dich jónk :) --O u WTB 08:56, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed the article.  Edward Hannis  [[File:CogHammer.gif]] 14:44, January 9, 2010 (UTC)