Forum:Downcounting from 100

To calm things down, we gon' do the opposite of Forum:Count :o

100 :o --O u WTB 09:38, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

99. :o 77topaz (talk) 10:00, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

98, but I do not see how this will help matters. MyOwnBadSelf ( talk  &middot;  stalk ) 10:30, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

97, yes, it's just the counting forum but with numbers in reverse order. 77topaz (talk) 12:03, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

96. The difference is that this Forum has a clear goal: we'll have to stop at 0 :o --O u WTB 12:39, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

Windows 95, but do we really? zero is not the last number see, then we get to -1, -2, and keep on counting down. horton11 13:07, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

94, yes, I had the same idea. :o 77topaz (talk) 23:15, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

93, but how does this even help? MyOwnBadSelf ( talk  &middot;  stalk ) 08:03, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

92, I'm not really sure. 77topaz (talk) 10:04, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

91. MyOwnBadSelf  ( talk  &middot;  stalk ) 11:12, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

90. No, you can't count negative things. Try counting the negative number of trees you see next to the road. No mathematic crap here, put your feet on the ground :o --O u WTB 12:31, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

89. But are we really counting "things" or "trees"? We're listing off numbers, and -14 is one of those. The wiki is a virtual environment, so no physical trees to count. horton11 13:26, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

88. Gotta agree with TM that you are annoying though :o --O u WTB 13:42, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

87. Wabba The I (talk) 19:56, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

86. The set of integers is actually just as much a countable set as the set of natural numbers. :o 77topaz (talk) 22:29, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

85. Agree with Horton. MyOwnBadSelf ( talk  &middot;  stalk ) 23:05, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

84. 77topaz (talk) 01:04, May 29, 2017 (UTC)