Talk:Labour Party

The SDP plans on merging together with the other parties, so you should put me and my party members as members. HORTON11 21:13, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

Darn, I was hoping you'd stay separate because of the rose thing (and I also like the name and logo). . . Anyway because I don't want to have too many Labour parties I will just say that the old Labour members were part of the SDP. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 21:21, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

TM what's wrong with you today, leaving out people and changing logos without permission. The old Labour and SDP ARE JOINING!!! Marcus/Michael Villanova 22:06, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

I know Labour is joining, but I thought the SDP was not going to join because the logo had no rose. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 22:16, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

Green Party
They're separate. There must be a small leftist party to even things out, and also it's cool to have a separate green party. It will also make the Congress chart look better. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 22:01, January 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * Why do keep thinking who control things outside your party. You don't, it's never been like that. Stop. Marcus/Michael Villanova 22:04, January 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * The greens have no reason to merge. And Labour was removed from history, remember? —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 22:04, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think Labour was erased, but You don't control the Greens or Labour so I can merge them which i've already done. I don't merge your parties or try to stop them to merge. Marcus/Michael Villanova 22:06, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Fine, I will give an MOTC to the Green Party right now. They should not merge, I don't want a huge gigantic leftist party to represent all leftists except for CPL.nm which is banned from merging by Yuri. There must be a separate Green Party that strongly focuses on the environment, not labour issues. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 22:07, January 6, 2012 (UTC)