Talk:State Elections, 2010

I would like to participate in the upcoming elections and run for governor. BastardRoyale 12:23, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lovely! JON   THE DUDE   JOHNSON  12:25, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I will run for governor of one of of the states, perhaps Sylvania? As a descendent of one of our greatest monarchs, Arthur III, Philip Bradly-Lashawn is a logical choice; according to tradition, the governors of this state have often been members of the royal family. Why break with this tradition? BastardRoyale 12:28, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yuri and I will think about our parties strategy and we'll inform you soon! JON   THE DUDE   JOHNSON  13:54, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems that Oceana only has two active members, So if one of them votes for him self and the other one himself are we tied? Marcus Villanova WLP [[Image:Flag of Lovia Small.png|border|20px]] 15:45, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Not exactly. There's a minimum limit of three votes for the top candidate. 15:47, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am very excited about the upcoming elections. I just wrote a major speech and love the idea of 'campaigning' and gathering supporters and followers. I also love it when newspapers are covering the lives and viewpoints of the individual candidates. When will there be an official form to 'sign in' and run for governor? It has to be made official at some point. BastardRoyale 16:06, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes there will. Congress has voted on the date, and from that date on (somewhere mid-September) you will be "official candidates". 16:08, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

May I ask why Walden now a party of Lovia that wants to abolish State Law and state Police should run for a STATE Office, I don't understand how you could run for a office that your party would make USELESS, -Perryz101 04:56, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * it's simple man: we wanted to abolish state law and state police because they were useless and didn't function. we DID abolish them together with the majority in congress (all these folks now run for governor too). we support the current form of states because they fulfill a function in society that would otherwise be lost, or had to be fulfilled by eiter congress or a sort of mayors. We're not making the governor's office useless yet: we have just made the office less undemocratic and less powerful. 05:40, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's true. Anyway, nearly all those in favor of the bill are now top candidates. 06:02, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * thnx. 06:05, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Kinda odd how you can have one office and you can have another political office in the Federal Government.-Perryz101 12:31, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * True, but take it in stride please, We're a small wiki so until we grow to about 40 active members then we'll be fo-reals! Marcus Villanova Walden [[Image:Flag of Lovia Small.png|border|20px]] 19:47, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * To abolish state law is somthing that could start a riot, and I really don't want that. 'Were not making the governor's office useless yet' seems like you are going to still, how is it undemocratic, Congress is making it undemocratic with not limiting the Governors with State Law. States need a Constitution.-Perryz101 20:22, September 10, 2010 (UTC)