User:Jon Johnson/Sandpit

Taxes Act
In the country of Lovia their are multiple sort of taxes. The taxes are collected according to the one cas principle.
 * 1) The general tax is charged upon the revenues of all inhabitants and enterprises according to the principles of progressivism and linearity.
 * 2) Interval A: income < 800$: 0%
 * 3) Interval B: 801$ - 1500$: 14%
 * 4) Interval C: 1501$ - 2500$: 22%
 * 5) Interval D: 2501$ - 4500$: 32%
 * 6) Interval E: income > 4500$: 45%


 * 1) Contributions are held on residences. The different sorts of this type of taxes are determinate by the occupied area.
 * 2) Retributions are special taxes which are allocated to all companies in the country of Lovia. The charge, in terms of percentage, depends on the possession of certificates granted by the specific departments of Energy and Environment, and Welfare. The system follows a reduction policy.
 * 3) Normal retribution standard: 16%
 * 4) Certificate reduction: 7%


 * 1) Lump-sum-charges are held on luxurious goods.
 * 2) Under the terms of luxurious goods we understand
 * 3) Every second, third and fourth house
 * 4) Exotic placement products
 * 5) All extra  personnel incomes besides the main income


 * 1) Penalty Tax, a sort of tax that is used by the congress to punish socially undesirable behavior
 * 2) Risk speculates
 * 3) Consumption of unhealthy goods


 * 1) Import policy
 * 2) The Lovian Country charges foreigns companies following the cascading formula.
 * 3) The Lovian Countrt charges Lovian companies which situated abroad more.
 * 4) Interval A: Sufficiant national supply: 25%
 * 5) Interval B: Normal national supply: 15%
 * 6) Interval C: Scarce national supply: 7%


 * Looks fair to me. I did take the liberty to change the 'international policy' to an 'import policy'. 14:56, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks seems more logic Jon Johnson 15:06, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I do not want to be a negativo but that are some taxes you have there. Why not keep it simple and have two general taxes next to an income tax. Besides I deem your import/international policy unnecessary. Harold Freeman 15:17, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * The international policy is, I think, necessary to create a safe intern market, you can't be against that. And besides their are so many special situations, so we really need multiple rules Jon Johnson 15:29, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know you don't like international free trade but I do. Harold Freeman 15:33, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not against international trade, therefor I've created some different intervals and the cascading formula Jon Johnson 15:41, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I see now with inland shortages and the sort. Excuse me my lack of financial knowledge. Harold Freeman 15:54, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * So can I count on your vote, when it comes in the first and second chamber? Jon Johnson 16:00, July 4, 2010 (UTC)