Just to clarify, are you supporting independence or autonomy within Lovia for Truth Island? HORTON11: •
16:19, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
Don't feel like edit warring, so my response is: "yes, actually". :P Anyone else have an opinion? —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 15:30, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
Marcus got some workers tied to the syndicate to strike in favor of Truth Island's autonomy. It happened and we should not change that. HORTON11: •
15:31, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Should we add that shortly after the party fell off the face of Lovia? Hoffmann
KunarianTALK 15:34, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- That is not a reason. There is nothing inherently wrong with retconning. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 15:37, April 1, 2015 (UTC) (edit conflict)
- It is, and the same can be said for the opposite. Things happened and we are not and should not be a perfect nation wiping out past events which some people don't like. HORTON11:
•
15:46, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- We are a wiki, so when someone makes an edit, that's not permanent, unlike real life. It is not like we are getting rid of something we don't like, it's something that makes no sense. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 15:49, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- We are a realistic wikination. If we make bad decisions or join less than favorable movements we should not simply undo that. HORTON11:
•
15:52, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- We are a realistic wikination. If we make bad decisions or join less than favorable movements we should not simply undo that. HORTON11:
- We are a wiki, so when someone makes an edit, that's not permanent, unlike real life. It is not like we are getting rid of something we don't like, it's something that makes no sense. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 15:49, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- It is, and the same can be said for the opposite. Things happened and we are not and should not be a perfect nation wiping out past events which some people don't like. HORTON11:
I find it stupid that a union would strike in favour of independence. There would have been vigorous dissent from within, at least. --Semyon 15:47, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed. Plus, the separatists were right-wing. So remove? :P —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 15:49, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- I say no. Nowhere is it specified those who support autonomy are right-wingers. HORTON11:
•
15:50, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- It's heavily implied, since the "Socialist Party" that momentarily existed in Truth Island was anti-independence, while the other party (can't remember the name) was (at most, and I think it was further right) centre. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 15:52, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- This was not linked to any of the parties in Truth Island. This was a union move. HORTON11:
•
15:54, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- This was not linked to any of the parties in Truth Island. This was a union move. HORTON11:
- It's heavily implied, since the "Socialist Party" that momentarily existed in Truth Island was anti-independence, while the other party (can't remember the name) was (at most, and I think it was further right) centre. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 15:52, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- I say no. Nowhere is it specified those who support autonomy are right-wingers. HORTON11:
Is anyone interested in giving this party a few seats after elections? If not, what should we do with it? —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 15:41, April 12, 2015 (UTC)
- I personally wouldn't be interested in giving it any seats, as it seems a bit too left wing even for me. Maybe it could disband? Frijoles333 TALK 15:46, April 12, 2015 (UTC)