I really would like to move this to just State Elections, 2014 as a "close enough" matter. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 19:24, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- That, I don't understand.. --OuWTB 19:31, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Let's move this to State Elections, 2014. The reason is because the way it is now is irritating. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 19:37, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Look at it this way: the Lovian civil service is very, very disorganized. :P --Semyon 19:39, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- They just got so excited about the election they time-travelled. Hoffmann
KunarianTALK 19:42, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Cuz they're usually held in October or why? --OuWTB 19:45, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- TM hasn't implicitly stated it, but I think that he proposes retconning it to be in 2014. However, I think that's unnecessary. We'll just say that due to the constitutional convention, the elections were delayed. --Semyon 19:47, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Ah well, if that's the case I'm neutral. --OuWTB 19:52, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- TM hasn't implicitly stated it, but I think that he proposes retconning it to be in 2014. However, I think that's unnecessary. We'll just say that due to the constitutional convention, the elections were delayed. --Semyon 19:47, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Cuz they're usually held in October or why? --OuWTB 19:45, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- They just got so excited about the election they time-travelled. Hoffmann
- Look at it this way: the Lovian civil service is very, very disorganized. :P --Semyon 19:39, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Let's move this to State Elections, 2014. The reason is because the way it is now is irritating. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 19:37, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- I'm proposing to retcon it to start on December 31 or so just so we can move the page to State Elections, 2014. —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 19:55, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Call these provisional elections? Hoffmann KunarianTALK 20:11, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- No, these are formal enough state elections, but regardless no retconning. They happened in 2015. HORTON11:
• 
20:31, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- What is your problem with retconning? —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 20:35, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- What is your unhealthy fixation on retconning? :P These elections took place in January 2015, due to very real reasons and it makes no sense to simply retcon them cause you want to. HORTON11: • 20:39, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- What is your unhealthy fixation on retconning? :P These elections took place in January 2015, due to very real reasons and it makes no sense to simply retcon them cause you want to. HORTON11:
- What is your problem with retconning? —TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 20:35, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
- No, these are formal enough state elections, but regardless no retconning. They happened in 2015. HORTON11:
- Call these provisional elections? Hoffmann
Name[]
Should we move this back to First State Elections, 2015? Seems like the previous consensus was to keeping it under that name, so not sure why it was just arbitrarily renamed. horton11 15:18, September 29, 2017 (UTC)
- To be honest, you're creating the impression that you're trying to start a fight with TM, which makes me very, very unsympathetic to your case. --Semyon 16:07, September 29, 2017 (UTC)
- I just wanna know we have a standard on stuff like this. I really do not want to start an argument, they've gone on long enough. Let's just forget my comment then if it's gonna lead to more of that. horton11 16:15, September 29, 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, I apologise if I misjudged you. I am personally neutral on renaming it, but I think either way it's not worth opening another can of worms. --Semyon 18:00, September 29, 2017 (UTC)
- I just wanna know we have a standard on stuff like this. I really do not want to start an argument, they've gone on long enough. Let's just forget my comment then if it's gonna lead to more of that. horton11 16:15, September 29, 2017 (UTC)